<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New VW Logo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.volksbloggin.com/2007/09/12/a-new-vw-logo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.volksbloggin.com/2007/09/12/a-new-vw-logo/</link>
	<description>Reviews, opinions and rants on all things Volkswagen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:06:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Maher</title>
		<link>http://www.volksbloggin.com/2007/09/12/a-new-vw-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-82390</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Maher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.volksbloggin.com/2007/09/12/a-new-vw-logo/#comment-82390</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea. I&#039;d have to agree with Dax and Jordan - leave it alone.  Volkswagen is over 50 years old, the logo is recognizable around the world.  Ford and Chevy have been in the industry for over 100 years, and they haven&#039;t majorly  messed with their logos - okay, they might&#039;ve done some minor touch-ups over the years - but what company (in any industry) hasn&#039;t touched-up their logo?

My vote - leave it alone. It&#039;s beautiful as it is now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea. I&#8217;d have to agree with Dax and Jordan &#8211; leave it alone.  Volkswagen is over 50 years old, the logo is recognizable around the world.  Ford and Chevy have been in the industry for over 100 years, and they haven&#8217;t majorly  messed with their logos &#8211; okay, they might&#8217;ve done some minor touch-ups over the years &#8211; but what company (in any industry) hasn&#8217;t touched-up their logo?</p>
<p>My vote &#8211; leave it alone. It&#8217;s beautiful as it is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dax</title>
		<link>http://www.volksbloggin.com/2007/09/12/a-new-vw-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-82273</link>
		<dc:creator>Dax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.volksbloggin.com/2007/09/12/a-new-vw-logo/#comment-82273</guid>
		<description>Oooh, messing with brands as strong and old as one such as Volkswagen is like letting kids play in a nuclear missile silo. It&#039;s all fun until someone presses the wrong button. I don&#039;t know, I don&#039;t think I would make this change, unless they&#039;re uber certain it&#039;s going to be successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh, messing with brands as strong and old as one such as Volkswagen is like letting kids play in a nuclear missile silo. It&#8217;s all fun until someone presses the wrong button. I don&#8217;t know, I don&#8217;t think I would make this change, unless they&#8217;re uber certain it&#8217;s going to be successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.volksbloggin.com/2007/09/12/a-new-vw-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-82209</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 06:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.volksbloggin.com/2007/09/12/a-new-vw-logo/#comment-82209</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t mess with success. They have a highly recognizable symbol and I see absolutely no reason to change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t mess with success. They have a highly recognizable symbol and I see absolutely no reason to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

